Petrol Prices Up
US petrol prices reached a seventh straight record on Saturday as prices across the country converged on or moved past $US3 a gallon.
Read MoreUS petrol prices reached a seventh straight record on Saturday as prices across the country converged on or moved past $US3 a gallon.
Read MoreUnlike its larger rival Fosters, brewer Lion Nathan managed to eke out higher earnings from its basic business, beer in Australia.
Read MoreThere’s a whiff of nervousness about the copper market.
Read MoreQantas chairman, Margaret Jackson, has bowed to rising pressure and will retire at the annual meeting later this year, making her the first casualty of the failed $11.1 billion bid for the airline.
Read MoreFor the moment we can add the sale of Coles Group to the list of life’s certainties: death and taxes.
Read MoreBut while exploration spending is at record levels, it has to find or prove up resources capable of being exploited in projects developed at existing operations or in new locations.
And that is the most impressive thing about the ABARE report.
The sheer health of the industry can be seen from the following two paragraphs.
“There are 43 projects (both advanced and less advanced) that are new to ABARE’s list since October 2006,” ABARE said..
“In the two year period from the end of April 2005 to the end of April 2007, over 166 projects have been added to ABARE’s project list.
“The number of newly listed projects in this timespan is unprecedented and is another indication of the current high level of investment interest in the mineral resources sector.
“Of the 43 projects added to the list, nine are either committed or already under construction.”
ABARE remarked that In line with previous project listings, the current investment intentions in the Australian mineral resources sector, as reflected in the large number and record value of minerals and energy projects committed to or under construction, “continue to bode well for the sector’s growth over the next few years.
“The 91 advanced projects as at April 2007 indicate continued expansion across most of the minerals and energy industry spectrum. Of the record 279 projects in ABARE’s April 2007 projects list, 67 per cent (188 projects) remain uncommitted.
“However, most of the projects that will ultimately proceed to development in the medium term are included in ABARE’s current list of 188 less advanced projects.”
The spending levels are at times mind boggling in their growth.
In 2004-05 around $10 billion was spent on new capital projects according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics and ABARE.
That jumped 80 per cent in 2005-06 to $18.6 billion, which according to the report was “more than double the average annual expenditure in real terms (2006-07 dollars) for the past 25 years.
“Surveys of industry intentions indicate the possibility of further increases to almost $23 billion in 2006-07 and over $30 billion in 2007-08.”
According to ABARE, if the capital expenditure in 2006-07 and 2007-08 is realised, this would represent increases of 22 per cent and 61 per cent respectively from the record expenditure in 2005-06.
“The expected continued high level of capital expenditure in the mining industry in the near future is consistent with the development trends shown in the full list of major mineral and energy projects.”
The metals industry is the only one to show a slowing in spending.
“Capital expenditure in the metals products sector, which includes the minerals processing activities covered in ABARE’s projects list, was $4.8 billion in 2005-06, 41 per cent above expenditure in 2004- 05.
“Paralleling the result in mining, real expenditure in the metal products sector in 2005-06 is the highest on record and more than double the 25 year annual average of $2.5 billion (in 2006-07 dollars).
“However, surveyed industry intentions suggest that metal products expenditure could fall in 2006-07 to about $4.1 billion and $3.2 billion in 2007-08.
“The possible decreases in metal products capital expenditure reflect the imminent completion of some large projects and the lack of commitment to any large metal processing projects in the past twelve months.”
Looking at the six months since the last report in October 2006, ABARE said that 23 major minerals and energy projects, with a total capital expenditure of $3.36 billion, were completed.
“The completion of these projects will result in increased production and export capacity for a range of commodities, including coal, natural gas, bauxite, base metals, gold, iron ore, mineral sands and nickel.
“The total number of projects completed in the six months ended April 2007 was one less than for the six months ended October 2006 and just below the record number (27) completed in the six months to April 2006.
“However, the total capital cost was significantly less than in the six months ended April 2006 and October 2006.
“The average value of projects completed in the six month period to April 2007 was $144 million, down from the historical nominal average over the past nine years of around $234 million.”
Looking ahead, ABARE’s list of projects suggests that the rate of project completions is likely to increase in the short term, with over 45 advanced projects scheduled for completion in the second half of 2007.
“However, there is the possibility that some of these projects will not meet announced scheduled completion dates or cost budgets, reflecting strong industry-wide competition for skilled labour and equipment.
“In addition, progress on a number of projects has been hampered by unfavourable weather conditions, particularly in Western Australia.”
At the end of April 2007, there were 91 projects at advanced stages of development included in ABARE’s projects list – these projects are either committed or under construction.
This was three fewer than the number of advanced projects included in the October 2006 list.
Despite the slight reduction in the number of advanced projects in the April 2007 list, there were still around 18 projects either newly committed or entered the list at an advanced stage in that six month period.
The announced capital expenditure of the 91 advanced projects at the end of April 2007 sums to $43.4 billion.
However, ABARE said it should be noted that even projects that have reached the committed stage may be deferred, modified or even cancelled if economic or competitive circumstances change sufficiently.
Among the more notable large scale projects in ABARE’s April 2007 list that are still undergoing feasibility studies are seven proposed LNG developments that, collectively, co
Any fears the resources boom might not last or might quickly vanish have been answered by the results of the latest survey of investment and spending from the Federal Government’s main resources adviser.
Prepared by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), the report looks at spending on mining developments, past, now and planned, as well as the amount spent on exploration.
In all cases, bar the metal industry, spending is at record or near record levels and based on the conservative estimates contained in the report, the boom could last for quite a while yet, thanks to the China boom.
That fits in with the thinking in a recent paper from the Reserve Bank on the boom and its sources and differences with past resources booms.
ABARE says that mining companies are planning a record $43.4 billion of new projects, thanks to higher demand and rising prices.
In a report published on its website yesterday ABARE said the value of advanced projects to build mines and oil and gas fields has risen 24 per cent from the $34.9 billion reported last October in the previous survey.
The bulk of the increased spending came from the approval of three new iron ore projects valued at $7 billion, according to the bureau.
ABARE said there was a record 279 major projects planned, with 91 considered to be ‘advanced’. A further 188 projects were at less advanced stages or undergoing feasibility studies, the Bureau said.
A feature of the report was the sharp rise in exploration spending that has happened, despite industry fears money was not being spent.
ABARE said exploration spending on minerals in Australia is estimated to total over $4 billion in 2006-07, an increase of over 56 per cent on exploration expenditure in 2005-06. In real terms (2006-07 dollars).
It said the spending in the 2007 financial year on exploration “will be the highest on record and around 72 per cent higher than the average annual expenditure on exploration over the past 25 years.
“While exploration expenditure has increased recently, it cannot be determined from ABS data what proportion of the increased expenditure is related to increased exploration activity or attributable to higher costs of inputs, such as labour and equipment.
In the first half of this decade, exploration expenditure in Australia, in real terms, was well below the annual average of the past 25 years.
“Brownfields exploration around known deposits – has made up an increased proportion of total exploration expenditure.
“This can be partly explained by the current trend of developing projects with larger production capacities, which generally require larger resource delineation programs.
“In addition, mining companies are reassessing reserves at current and depleted mining areas, with the view of extracting additional reserves that are now considered to be economic at current high commodity prices.
“Mining at or around existing deposits is attractive for companies because projects can be started sooner and generally have a lower capital expenditure because often there is existing infrastructure in place.
“In 2006-07, exploration expenditure is expected to increase across all major commodities.
“Petroleum exploration is estimated to increase to $2.14 billion, an increase of 64 per cent from 2005-06. Petroleum exploration expenditure in 2006-07 is likely to be the highest (in real terms) since 1982-83 and 74 per cent higher than the annual average over the past 25 years.
“Increased petroleum exploration has been encouraged by historically high global oil prices. With world oil prices forecast to remain relatively high in the short term, exploration expenditure can be expected to remain historically high.
“Iron ore exploration expenditure in 2006-07 is estimated to almost double to $320 million.
“A number of successive annual contract price rises and the prospect of continued strong Chinese demand for iron over the medium term are important drivers behind the significant increase in expenditure.
“Since 2003-04, gold exploration expenditure in real terms has remained relatively stable at around $400 million a year.
“In 2006-07, however, gold exploration expenditure is estimated to increase by 25 per cent to $515 million.
“The increase in gold exploration activity is attributable to the increase in Australian dollar gold prices, which in 2006 averaged $800 an ounce, an increase of 37 per cent from 2005.
“Base metals exploration expenditure in 2006-07 is estimated to total $560 million, an increase of 52 per cent from 2005-06.
“This increase is mainly attributable to strong rises in expenditure on copper, nickel and silver-lead-zinc exploration, reflecting substantial rises in global prices for these commodities.
“For example, in 2006, copper prices increased by over 80 per cent, while nickel prices rose by more than 65 per cent.
“In real terms, exploration expenditure on base metals in 2006-07 is expected to be more than double the 25 year average ($260 million) and the highest on record.”
Building products and sugar group, CSR, would be on most lists of companies to be ‘hugged’ or ‘grabbed’ by a private equity group seeking an easy conquest.
Such is the company’s below par profit performance you have to wonder why that hasn’t happened.
Is it the fact that it operates in the highly political sugar industry in Queensland which would easily defeat any attempt by a financial buyer to get greater efficiencies and lower costs?
Or is its presence in the building industry and its continuing reliance on property development for a small but significant contribution to annual earnings that keeps the raiders at bay?
Certainly the involvement in aluminium isn’t of interest given there are pre-emptive rights and the metal output is heavily hedged which denies CSR the full benefit of strong world prices.
And now, thanks to lower results from sugar, a fall in property earnings and perhaps from building products, CSR is looking at a fall in 2008 earnings, after yesterday reporting a small drop for the 2007 year.
The shares fell by around 14c to $3.56, which is well under the $4 level when it was being touted as a buyout candidate late last year.
CSR said net profit was $273.3 million for the year to March 31, down from $305 million in fiscal 2006 and excluding significant items, the result was $240.5 million, a decline of 3.7 per cent.
The company said earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) was $406.1 million, down 2.6 per cent from $416.8 million.
All in all a ‘gentle decline’ and reflective of the company’s vague positioning and future prospects.
The new CEO, Jerry Maycock said in a statement accompanying the results that his early priorities for the coming year will be to assess further opportunities for growth, while focusing on a number of initiatives in each business to enhance performance and reduce costs.
“CSR has a great brand and an exciting future, albeit with shorter term challenges. At this early stage in the year, we expect the overall EBIT result is unlikely to reach last year,” Mr Maycock said.
(There was the bad news amid all the spin).
“The medium term outlook for our businesses is positive as we will begin to benefit from recent investments to improve performance and we have a number of interesting growth opportunities under review both in our current operations and by external acquisitions.”
CSR blamed the full year result on “external adverse market conditions for some of its businesses”.
Sugar profits rose with EBIT up 5.2 per cent to $130.1 million, despite interruptions to milling season caused by wet weather.
Wet weather reduced sugar production and yields and increased milling costs, offsetting some of the benefits of higher prices. But while sugar production will be higher this year, the emerging oversupply situation and volatile prices will push earnings lower.
Building products continued to be hurt by the ongoing slowdown in the residential housing market, particularly in New South Wales and while EBIT of $84.5 million was up from $80.9 million in 2006, that result was hurt by one-off costs of $20.6 million related to two plant closures.
Macquarie Bank has raised $750 million from a placement to the professional end of the market and is looking to tap smaller shareholders for up $348 million.
Read MoreXstrata has returned fire in the takeover battle for LionOre Mining International, Australia’s third largest nickel producer, by increasing its takeover bid to $6.7 billion.
Read MoreOfficeworks and Target seem to be the assets most interested buyers want in the break up of Coles Group.
Read MoreA week is supposed to be a long time in politics, in retailing these days it seems to be very, very quick.
Take David Jones for instance. It was only last Wednesday that the retailer was warning the market that it might lose a store in the Eastgardens mall in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs.
The retailer said:
“The lease relating to David Jones’ Eastgardens (NSW) store expires in October 2007. The Company has been in discussions with Terrace Towers (the owner of the centre) although to date, agreement has not been reached.”
Mr McInnes said, “Whilst our firm preference is to enter a long-term Eastgardens lease, we are not yet in a position to do so. In the event that an acceptable agreement is not reached, we believe that Myer is likely to enter the Centre”.
Yesterday that expectation was realised with the news that the now privately-owned Myer will replace rival David Jones at the Westfield’s Eastgardens.
And Mr McInnes made it quite clear why the retailer had withdrawn from the centre:
“Despite lengthy negotiations with Terrace Towers we have been unable to reach agreement on terms that are economically feasible for our Company and in the interests of our shareholders.
“The profit that would be generated under the proposed terms of the lease will be captured as we transfer David Jones’ customers to our Bondi Junction and Sydney CBD stores.
This can be achieved at a vastly reduced investment on David Jones’ part in comparison to renewing the lease on the terms proposed.
“We believe that given our decision not to accept Terrace Towers’ terms and renew our Eastgardens lease, Myer will enter the centre on the terms we declined.
“In our view entering into a lease on the terms proposed by Terrace Towers reflects a decision based on short term sales gain with limited long term benefit for the lessee.
“David Jones’ Store Portfolio strategy is very straight forward – we will not commit to a long term lease on the basis of short term Sales growth – our decision will always be based on what delivers the best overall value to our shareholders over the life of each lease,” Mr McInnes said.
“Our Eastgardens store profit has been in decline since the opening of the redeveloped Bondi Junction centre in 2004.
By any measure the image of Macquarie Bank in the market is of an entrepreneurial financial services company with ambitious plans and a fairly adventurous approach to doing business.
Read MoreThere’s a small problem that might just cut the billion dollar-plus valuation Coles expects to get for its Officeworks chain of business supplies.
Read MoreCould we be on the verge of a significant shake-up in the global auto industry?
Read MoreOnce again we have had a reminder that it pays to think long and hard about takeover offers and be a little slow in accepting.
You never know what might be around the corner, especially if big shareholders start talking about the company being undervalued.
We have just seen that with the mop-up bid for the 16.4 per cent minority holdings in Colorado from Hong Kong equity Fund AEP and its local arm, ARH, at $6.20 a share.
And we received an even better reminder yesterday from Flight Centre when the second version of a deal with private equity group, Pacific Equity Partners, was revealed.
Flight Centre said it had reached preliminary agreement to transfer its assets into a venture with PEP, around two months after a $1.6 billion management buyout bid with PEP was rejected at a shareholders meeting.
This deal stems from that rejection of the $17.20 a share buyout offer from PEP.
It forced PEP to come again with a new offer that emerged yesterday and is similar in style to the joint ventures PBL and the Seven Network struck with CVC Asia and KKR respectively.
Speculation about the deal has seen the FLT share price driven to above the $17.20price and yesterday it rose to $17.70, up 20c on the day.
Under the proposed deal with PEP, Flight Centre will raise $1.1 billion in cash by transferring all its operating businesses into the venture.
Flight Centre will own 70 percent of the venture and Sydney-based PEP will own the rest. If certain targets are met, PEP’s stake will rise to one third and FLT’s stake will fall to 66.6 per cent.
Flight Centre said in a statement to the ASX yesterday that it would now proceed to negotiate and finalise an Implementation Agreement with PEP as quickly as possible.
“Under the terms of the agreement, it is proposed that PEP will purchase a 30% economic interest in a leveraged joint venture to be formed to acquire the FLT business’s operational assets. PEP’s minority holding will increase to one-third if the business achieves certain targets.
“FLT shareholders will effectively retain an initial 70% economic interest in the joint venture’s business via their existing FLT shares. This interest will reduce to two thirds if the targets are achieved.
“FLT expects to receive about $1.1 billion in cash proceeds from the transaction, to be sourced from debt facilities entered into by the joint venture and the amount paid by PEP ($195 million) in acquiring its economic interest.
“It is proposed that the substantial part of these proceeds will be returned to FLT shareholders as a combination of cash and franking credits via an off-market buyback of FLT shares.
“The proposed buy-back is expected to be structured along similar lines to that proposed during the previous privatisation proposal and will be implemented by way of a scheme of arrangement.”
The company said it would offer a way for smaller shareholders to exit in full for an as yet to be determined cash amount per share if they do not wish to indirectly hold a continuing interest in the leveraged, restructured FLT business.
In addition, FLT shareholders will receive a $0.40 per share fully franked final dividend for the current financial year. The final dividend is expected to be paid prior to the transaction’s completion.
The sale of the FLT business to the joint venture will be subject to approval by an ordinary resolution of shareholders at a FLT shareholders meeting and will not be conditional on the outcome of the scheme of arrangement to facilitate the subsequent off-market buy-back of FLT shares.
Prior to any such meeting, an independent expert will review and evaluate both the sale transaction and the proposed scheme of arrangement.
The scheme of arrangement to facilitate the subsequent off-market buyback of FLT shares will be subject to a resolution passed by 75per cent in value and 50 per cent in number of shareholders present and voting at that meeting.
FLT chairman Bruce Brown said: “This proposal has the potential to benefit FLT and its shareholders, including those who do not wish to maintain an investment in what will become a highly leveraged vehicle”.
The company said the deal will release a significant cash amount to shareholders, introduce a disciplined and experienced strategic partner in PEP with a strong track record of delivering high returns, deliver an attractive cash exit opportunity for smaller shareholders via a tax-effective off-market buy-back and provide those Flight Centre shareholders who choose not to sell with the opportunity to participate in the FLT business’s future upside potential.
It said this potential was “evidenced by the company’s recent upgraded profit outlook for the current year, and also create the potential for enhanced returns by introducing significantly greater leverage than can be practically obtained at the moment.”
The creation of the leveraged joint venture will not affect the travel agency business’s day-to-day operations and the joint venture’s cash flow will primarily be used to service the business’s new debt.
That will mean income and franking credits will not be important and any returns will probably be more capital in nature.
FLT told investors late last month that “Preliminary results for the nine months to March 31 2007 show that FLT’s pre tax profit is ahead of expectation and about 18% up on the previous corresponding period, excluding the abnormal $22.4 million gain from the sale of FLT’s Adelaide Street headquarters”.
That upgrade and the possible venture with PEP (which was announced a month earlier) helped rekindle interest in FLT shares and has pushed them past the $17.20 level of the first offer.
The 2007 financial year is turning out to be a bonanza for shareholders in construction giant, Leighton Holdings.
For the second time in three months the company has boosted its earnings outlook for 2007 and 2008.
The latest upgrade in earnings has seen the shares push towards the $40 level.
That was after the shares rose through $20 and $30 on the back of numerous new contracts here and in Asia and the Middle East, sharply higher interim earnings and then some takeover speculation.
In fact the shares have more than doubled from under $18 at the time of the 2006 final profit announcement last August and yesterday when they traded as high as $40.26 before settling back around $39.40, up $1.50 on the day.
A tightly held float helps put a turbo under the share price: Hochtief AG of Germany owns 55 per cent of Leighton (which is in turn owned 25 per cent by the ACS construction group of Spain).
Apart from the small float, the reason for the rapid rise isn’t hard to see: Leighton has been riding the resources, infrastructure and construction booms here and throughout Asia.
The company earned $276 million after tax in 2006 and yesterday upgraded the 2007 figure to a rise of 55 per cent, and a further improvement in the following year. That would put net earnings around $427 million for 2007.
That’s above the forecast made when the interim profit was announced in February. Profit after tax jumped 61 per cent to just over $190 million for the half to December and LEI said that second half earnings would boost the full year by 45 per cent.
“The Group’s already high level of work in hand should be maintained at similar levels over the second half of the financial year, “directors said.
“Providing significant momentum, the work in hand is expected to produce strong levels of revenue for the period and full year revenue of approximately $12 billion.”
Yesterday’s statement made it clear that those conditions had continued.
Leighton said operating net profit for the nine months to March 31 jumped to $273 million (almost as much as earned in 2006), from $169 million in the same period last year.
So if inflation remains under control,does that mean the US economy is not facing a period of stagflation but is merely stagnating?
Read MoreAre world oil prices about to repeat last year’s surge to record levels?
Read MoreChina has further loosened controls on overseas investments by Chinese domestic investors, a move that’s likely to trigger a sharp rise in the outflow of funds into markets in Asia and elsewhere.
Read MoreNo matter how you measure it the Chinese stock market is a bubble waiting to go pop.
Warnings have been issued from the government to leading brokers such as Goldman Sachs yesterday, but Chinese investors are not listening.
Investors are having too much fun: the fears of February 28 when the market fell 8.5 per cent in a day on sudden worries of moves to curtail speculation, have been long forgotten.
New share offerings are doubling in value on day one of the IPO listing and shareholder accounts are multiplying at a phenomenal rate, millions a months according to media reports in Hong Kong and international business papers.
So far this year, the domestic currency “A” share market is up 44 per cent and daily turnover exceeds $US30 billion, which is enormous when you consider how much we trade $A4 to $A6 billion on a big day here in Australia.
What to do is the big question for the Chinese Government.
As we have seen with the wider economy, three interest rate rises, a small rise in the Yuan and seven increases in the official reserve ratio which controls bank lending, have not stopped the boom in investment, property and the stockmarket speculation.
The market is rising by almost one per cent a day, sometimes more, so these official measures will have no impact unless interest rates rise very sharply and quickly.
Why would any one keep money in a bank and get at most three per cent or so when by the end of one week’s trading you could have earned five per cent?
For ordinary Chinese it is a no brainer; from the Government’s point of view it is a nightmare because they know that if the market takes fright or suddenly implodes, there will be economic and social unrest, demonstrations and possible worse.
Economic activity and confidence would be damaged. The stakes are high, very high.
It is why we here in Australian enjoying our sweet economy at the moment, should be casting a wary eye northward and starting to wonder if we should be a little more conservative.
…………….
Goldman Sachs’ warning got a lot of play throughout Asia yesterday with all the major news services giving it prominence.
Whether it will be self-fulfilling is another thing but the fact that it has been uttered is interesting because it fits in with the official concern on the mainland.
Goldman Sachs would not have said anything if the Chinese Government and its officials had not already been expressing concern.
Goldman said that China’s shares may face a “correction” as earnings can’t justify the rally that’s made them the world’s star performers this year.
China’s CSI 300 Index, which tracks Yuan-denominated A shares listed on the country’s two exchanges.
It’s the world’s most expensive key stock index, at 42 times reported earnings, more than double the Morgan Stanley Capital International Asia Pacific Index’s at 19 times.
Goldman said yesterday that “Current valuations are demanding and seem to have outpaced the improvement in market fundamentals. The “risk of market euphoria is building up.”
China’s investors opened 385,121 new accounts at brokerages on May 8, that’s the highest daily number since records were first published by the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corp. in June of 2005.
But according to the official Chinese newsagency there were 4.78 million new stock trading accounts opened in China, and 4.5 million in April alone. That’s the best example of how the boom has become a bubble.
As the National Australia Bank completed the interim reporting season for most of our major banks yesterday the industry was casting a worried eye across the Tasman.
Read MoreThe National Australia Bank is back in the banking game in Australia after three tough years.
Read MoreUp one day, down the next, there’s nothing like the craziness of a stockmarket showing signs of overheating.
Read MoreNews Corp chairman, Rupert Murdoch wasn’t saying much about much at all on the telephone this morning, especially about his ambitions for the Wall Street Journal, in commentary after the release of the company’s third quarter results.
Nor was he very precise about what he might do next after selling out of Fairfax ahead of the merger which took place yesterday.He didn’t rule out a deal here but didn’t actually say whether he was looking at anything. He and his executives have already indicated to investors they think the Ten Network, currently on the market, is over priced.He said Fairfax’s merger with Rural Press had increased the size of the company and it no longer needed “our help” in its defence.
Developers like AV Jennings, Australand and a host of their competitors don’t need statistics to tell you how bad the Sydney property market is and NSW for that matter.
Developers are abandoning the state for Victoria and Queensland or de-emphasising the importance of housing in the state while pursuing other projects, such as small shopping centres and commercial properties.
There’s just no certainty in NSW or Sydney, which is hurting the housing industry across the board because the state (and Sydney in particular) is the biggest market in the country (like it is for so many domestic activities)
Sydney’s underperformance is showing up in official figures which measure house price movements.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) said yesterday that average house prices grew by an average 1.1 per cent across the country in the first three months of 2007, but Sydney house prices again struggled to the point where they went backwards.
The ABS said its House Price Index, which takes the average of the nation’s eight capital cities, grew 8.6 per cent in the 12 months to March (which nearly matches the growth in the dollar value of retail sales. That’s not an accurate comparison but more confirmation of how sweet the economy is at the moment).
But prices in the nation’s biggest housing market in Sydney fell by an average 0.4 per cent in the first quarter, and grew at just 1.5 per cent over the year to march.
Here’s a perfect example of why accepting a takeover offer early (as many did in Qantas) can be self-defeating.
Hong Kong-based private equity group, Affinity Equity Partners (AEP) says it is offering $6.20 a share for the 16.4 per cent it doesn’t own in Brisbane-based retailer, Colorado Group.
The announcement came late Tuesday night as the country was preoccupied by the Federal Budget. When a trading halt ended yesterday the shares rose $1.09 to $6.02.
AEP’s Australian arm Australian Retail Holdings (ARH) said it believes “its offer provides the existing minority shareholders in Colorado with a compelling opportunity to crystallise substantial value from their shareholding without exposure to the significant execution risks faced by Colorado in implementing its current business strategy”.
This means they REALLY want CDO minorities to sell their shares.
The offer saw the CDO board call off a shareholder meeting yesterday that was going to consider a 52c a share capital return ($49.9 million), which would have benefited AEP with its 83.6 per cent stake in the retailer, and Solomon Lew, who holds a blocking 10.9 per cent stake.
The offer price is a 26 per cent premium to the closing price on Tuesday and a substantial amount above the cash price of $4.18 and 52c special dividend paid last October in the first offer last year.
That totaled $4.70 a share which was a substantial premium in itself above the CDO share price before the bid from AEP, which was notable for being the first hostile bid in this country from a private equity buyer who normally like to ‘hug’ and ‘hold ‘ their targets.
By holding out the prospect of a big gain, AEP is hoping to lure Lew into selling, but going by his stance at Country Road where he has remained a ‘locked’ in shareholder with around 12 per cent and an irritant for the South African owners, I wouldn’t be betting on him accepting too quickly.
After all he doesn’t need the money having sold his stake in Coles to Wesfarmers for more than $1.1 billion for his main company, Premier Investments.
In calling the now postponed meeting, Colorado said its capital structure was inefficient and the AEP local subsidiary ARH proposed the 52c a share capital return to create a more efficient capital structure for CDO.
CDO was in the process of completing a term debt facility to repay the $49.9 million borrowed from ARH to fund the share special dividend paid to shareholders on 6 October 2006.
A day after the Australian Bureau of Statistics produced retail sales figures showing good times in our shops,department store retailer, David Jones, has confirmed the strength of the boom.
But at the same time the retailer hinted that it could be losing sales from two Sydney suburban stores if lease negotiations are not settled.
DJS said third quarter sales rose 8.4 per cent jump, taking the nine month sales figures to $1.47 billion. That’s up 8 per cent on the first 9 months of 2006.
That saw the shares rise, then ease several cents to close at$4.83 after hitting a day’s high of $4.93 yesterday.
To make it better the third and fourth quarters of 2006 are when David Jones’ rebound from a couple of sluggish years first appeared and started powering the company’s sales, earnings and share price higher.
CEO Mark McInnes warned at the interim report earlier this year that the growth rate might slow because of the pick up in the third and fourth quarters of 2006 but the company continues to beat expectations.
The ABS said March sales rose 1.1 per cent compared to February, with Department store sales up 3.6 per cent alone (but that might have been influenced by Easter and not fully adjusted, according to some retail analysts).
The ABS said that in original terms (unadjusted which is what the market works off) March sales were 8.2 per cent higher than March 2006.
March quarter sales were up two per cent, or up 7.8 per cent in original terms on the March quarter of 2006 so David Jones has been better than ‘system’
Mr McInnes said the company benefited from strong performances across all categories, including men’s and women’s apparel, footwear and homewares.
“All states delivered strong Sales growth with Western Australia being the stand out performer.”
The faint signs of recovery in the Australian home building market seem to have disappeared once again with the news of a sharp drop in March approvals, thanks to a slump in flats and home units.
Read MoreQantas says it’s ready to move on and would not necessarily support any new bid from Airline Partners Australia, a stance that would almost certainly sink any offer if it was made.
Read MoreThere's an easy explanation for the split in the Packer Empire, announced yesterday. While the overall market is up around 11 to 12 per cent since January 1, shares in PBL, the key company in the Empire, had only risen 3 to 4 per cent, much to the frustration and annoyance of James Packer and his board.
Read MoreThe 2007-08 Federal Budget won’t cause too many problems.
Read MoreThere’s at least one Rinker Group shareholder which listened to the company’s honest forecast of a possible dip in 2008 earnings, looked at the latest figures on housing and real estate from the US, sawa change in the offer from Cemex and pulled the plug, accepting the offer from the Mexican giant and almost certainly guaranteeing the success of the offer.
Read MoreBudget time tonight and it is really going to be a case of look for the fiscal measures because monetary policy has already been taken care of by the Reserve Bank and there are no nasties lurking anywhere, except if Mr Costello and Mr Howard prove to be too generous.
Read MoreOn the face of it the drought is so bad that major suppliers of inputs and services, such as fertilizer companies should be battling to make a quid.
Read MoreShares in Qantas will come under selling pressure today if trading is allowed but don’t expect a rout.
Read MoreThe bid to takeover Qantas is dead.
Read MoreQantas and not the Federal Budget tomorrow night will overshadow the market today and probably for the next few days while the tension is taken out of the share price.
Investors will be wondering what it means and whether it will damage overall market sentiment.
In contrast the bullishness of the Budget has already been factored in after the Reserve Bank’s good report card last week.
Certainly we have seen big takeover deals fall over in the past: Flight Centre’s attempt to go private with private equity buyers was one instance, while the takeovers for Colorado Group and Pacifica both fell short.
Flight Centre shares late last week regained the $17.20 price in the first offer: now that the private equity buyer is back with another proposal and with improving business conditions, the rejection of the offer by fund manager, Lazards, has been justified.
And with the likes of APN News and Media and Rinker facing shareholder opposition to their buyouts or takeovers, no one can discount those deals falling over.
But after Friday’s finish at yet another record of 6296, up 2.5 per cent, the opening today is going to be considerably less certain.
Leads from overseas from Wall Street and commodity prices won’t be enough to offset the uncertainty the Qantas bid situation has caused.
The US job creation machine closed to its weakest growth rate for more than two years in April: just 88,000 new jobs created, half the 177,000 created in March. The unemployment rate rose to 4.5 per cent from 4.4 per cent.
The Dow Jones closed 23 points higher at 13,264, in its fourth record close in a row. The Dow has now risen in 23 of the last 26 sessions, marking its longest bull run since the summer of 1927, according to US market watchers.
We all know what happened in the autumn of 1929!
The broader S&P 500 rose 3 to 1,505.The S&P 500 is not far from its all-time high of 1527.46 hit reached March 2000 at the end of the great tech boom.
The Nasdaq rose 6 to end at 2,572 a six-year high.
For the week, the Dow rose up about 1.1 per cent, the Nasdaq gained 0.6 per cent and the S&P about 0.8 per cent.
This week will be dominated by the Federal Reserve’s policy statement as well as reports on retail sales and wholesale inflation figures.
……………………